SIST EN ISO 14111:2000

SLOVENSKI STANDARD
SIST EN ISO 14111:2000
01-december-2000
Zemeljski plin - Smernice za sledljivost pri analizah (ISO 14111:1997)
Natural gas - Guidelines to traceability in analysis (ISO 14111:1997)
Erdgas - Leitlinien für die Rückführbarkeit in der Analytik (ISO 14111:1997)
Gaz naturel - Lignes directrices pour la traçabilité en analyse (ISO 14111:1997)
Ta slovenski standard je istoveten z: EN ISO 14111:1999
ICS:
75.060 Zemeljski plin Natural gas
SIST EN ISO 14111:2000 en
2003-01.Slovenski inštitut za standardizacijo. Razmnoževanje celote ali delov tega standarda ni dovoljeno.

---------------------- Page: 1 ----------------------

SIST EN ISO 14111:2000

---------------------- Page: 2 ----------------------

SIST EN ISO 14111:2000

---------------------- Page: 3 ----------------------

SIST EN ISO 14111:2000

---------------------- Page: 4 ----------------------

SIST EN ISO 14111:2000

---------------------- Page: 5 ----------------------

SIST EN ISO 14111:2000

---------------------- Page: 6 ----------------------

SIST EN ISO 14111:2000
INTERNATIONAL IS0
STANDARD 14111
First edition
1997-03-15
Natural gas - Guidelines to traceability
in analysis
Gaz na turel - Lignes directrices pour la traCabilit6 en analyse
Reference number
IS0 14111 :I 997(E)

---------------------- Page: 7 ----------------------

SIST EN ISO 14111:2000
IS0 14111:1997(E)
Page
Contents
............................................................................................ 1
1 Scope
1
2 Normative references .
2
3 Definitions .
4 Fundamental principles of metrological traceability . 4
5 Elaboration of the traceability concept . 6
6 Chemical composition and the SI system . 7
7 Traceability in natural-gas analysis . 10
Hierarchy of reference gas mixtures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
8
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
9 Role of traceability in uncertainty assessment
10 Implementation of traceability in International Standards for
...................................................................... 17
natural-gas analysis
19
11 Examples .
21
12 Summary .
Annexes
A Supplementary terms and definitions . 23
............................. 26
B Example of typical interlaboratory test results
.................................................................................. 28
C Bibliography
0 IS0 1997
All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part of this publication may be
reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including
photocopying and microfilm, without permission in writing from the publisher.
International Organization for Standardization
Case postale 56 l CH-1211 Geneve 20 l Switzerland
Internet: central@iso.ch
x.400: c=ch; a=400net; p=iso; o=isocs; s=central
Printed in Switzerland
ii

---------------------- Page: 8 ----------------------

SIST EN ISO 14111:2000
IS0 14111:1997(E)
@ IS0
Foreword
IS0 (the International Organization for Standardization) is a worldwide
federation of national standards bodies (IS0 member bodies). The work of
preparing International Standards is normally carried out through IS0
technical committees. Each member body interested in a subject for
which a technical committee has been established has the right to be
represented on that committee. International organizations, governmental
and non-governmental, in liaison with ISO, also take part in the work. IS0
collaborates closely with the International Electrotechnical Commission
(IEC) on all matters of electrotechnical standardization.
Draft International Standards adopted by the technical committees are
circulated to the member bodies for voting. Publication as an International
Standard requires approval by at least 75 % of the member bodies casting
a vote.
International Standard IS0 14111 was prepared by Technical Committee
lSO/TC 193, Natural gas, Subcommittee SC 1, Analysis of natural gas.
Annexes A to C of this International Standard are for information only.

---------------------- Page: 9 ----------------------

SIST EN ISO 14111:2000
@ IS0
IS0 14111:1997(E)
Introduction
At a time when assurances of measurement accuracy in natural-gas
analyses are increasingly being sought, every analytical chemist
responsible for the design and operation of systems used in such analyses
needs to be aware of, and adopt, suitable means by which he or she will
be able to provide these assurances. This implies that the analyst must
employ validated methods in which each result is securely linked, through
a series of reference materials (reference gas mixtures), to accepted
metrological standards. The formal structure which the analyst creates in
doing this constitutes what is called a traceability chain. Only by this
means will the analyst be able to secure and support a proper estimate of
measurement accuracy (uncertainty).
This seemingly simple concept is elaborated in considerable detail in this
International Standard. The practical considerations involved in the
establishment of a satisfactory traceability chain give rise to challenging
problems, particularly in natural-gas analysis, but relevant and useful
advice is provided.
At present, traceability of measurement is universally defined through the
existence of unbroken calibration chains ending at the level of international
or national measurement standards realizing appropriate SI units. This
concept originates from the field of physical metrology, where it has been
implemented with apparent success. Transfer of the metrological scheme
to chemical analysis and other domains in the field of testing is, however,
a highly difficult task, for which standard methods are not yet available.
Therefore it is not possible, at present, to standardize the implementation
of measurement traceability in natural-gas analysis, or in other areas of
chemical analysis.
For the reasons indicated above, this International Standard does not give
any specific traceability protocols. Instead, its purpose is to
- clarify fundamental concepts involved in chemical traceability;
identify basic problems in the application of metrology in chemistry;
indicate feasible solutions on a reference material basis;
implementations using reference gas
- assist in the design of practical
mixtures;
- serve as a reference document for the application of the traceability
concept in other International Standards for natural-gas analysis.
iv

---------------------- Page: 10 ----------------------

SIST EN ISO 14111:2000
IS0 14111:1997(E)
INTERNATIONAL STANDARD @ IS0
- Guidelines to traceability in analysis
Natural gas
1 Scope
This International Standard provides general guidelines on the implementation and application of traceability
concepts in the analysis of natural gas. Its purpose is to lay down the foundations for the development of specific
traceability protocols in other International Standards for natural-gas analysis.
NOTE - Besides the field of natural-gas analysis, this International Standard could also be useful as a guidance document in
other areas of gas analysis and in related fields such as air quality measurement, vehicle emission monitoring and reference-
gas mixture preparation.
2 Normative references
The following standards contain provisions which, through reference in this text, constitute provisions of this
International Standard. At the time of publication, the editions indicated were valid. All standards are subject to
revision, and parties to agreements based on this International Standard are encouraged to investigate the
possibility of applying the most recent editions of the standards indicated below. Members of IEC and IS0 maintain
registers of currently valid International Standards.
- Part 1: Probability and general statistical terms.
IS0 3534-l : 1993, Statistics - Vocabulary and symbols
IS0 5168:- 1) , Measurement of fluid flow - Evaluation of uncertainties.
IS0 5725-l :I 994, Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results - Part I: General
principles and definitions.
IS0 5725-2: 1994, Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results - Part 2: Basic method
for the determination of repeatability and reproducibility of a standard measurement method.
IS0 5725-3:1994, Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results - Part 3: Intermediate
measures of the precision of a measurement method.
IS0 5725-4:1994, Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results - Part 4: Basic
methods for the determination of the trueness of a standard measurement method.
IS0 5725-6:1994, Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results - Part 6: Use in
practice of accuracy values.
Preparation of calibration gas mixtures - Weighing methods (including addendum 1).
IS0 6142:1981, Gas analysis -
1) To be published. (Revision of IS0 5168:1978)

---------------------- Page: 11 ----------------------

SIST EN ISO 14111:2000
@ IS0
IS0 14111:1997(E)
Determination of composition of calibration gas mixtures - Comparison methods.
IS0 6143:1981, Gas analysis -
Checking of calibration gas mixtures by a comparison method.
IS0 6711 :I 981, Gas analysis -
Determination of composition with defined uncertainty by gas chromatography -
IS0 6974-l :- *), Natural gas -
Part I: Guidelines for tailored analysis.
Determination of composition with defined uncertainty by gas chromatography -
I SO 6974-2:- *), Natural gas -
Part 2: Measuring-s ys tern characteristics and statistics for data processing.
IS0 6976: 1995, Natural gas - Calculation of calorific values, density, relative density and Wobbe index from
composition.
Model for quality assurance in design, development, production, installation and
IS0 9001 :I 994, Quality systems -
servicing.
Part 1: Metrological confirmation
IS0 10012-I :I 992, Quality assurance requirements for measuring equipment -
s ys tern for measuring equipment.
IS0 10723:1995, Natural gas - Performance requirements for on-line analytical s ys terns.
IS0 Guide 30:1992, Terms and definitions used in connection with reference materials.
IS0 Guide 33:1989, Uses of certified reference materials.
General and statistical principles.
IS0 Guide 35:1989, Certification of reference materials -
BIPM/IEC/IS0/0IML/IFCC/IUPAC. International vocabulary of basic and general terms in metrology (VIM), second
edition, 1993.
3 Definitions
For the purposes of this International Standard, the following definitions apply.
3.1 traceability: A property of the result of a measurement or the value of a standard whereby it can be related
to stated references, usually national or international standards, through an unbroken chain of comparisons all
having stated uncertainties.
NOTES
1 The concept is often expressed by the adjective “traceable ”.
2 The unbroken chain of comparisons is called a “traceability chain ”. [VIM]
3.2 (measurement) standard, etalon: A material measure, measuring instrument, reference material or
measuring system intended to define, realize, conserve or reproduce a unit or one or more values of a quantity to
serve as a reference.
EXAMPLES
a) 1 kg mass standard;
b) 100 &I standard resistor;
standard ammeter;
c)
d) caesium frequency standard;
e) standard hydrogen electrode;
f) reference solution of cortisol in human serum having a certified concentration. [VIM]
2) To be published. (Revision, in parts, of IS0 6974:1984)
2

---------------------- Page: 12 ----------------------

SIST EN ISO 14111:2000
@ IS0
IS0 14111:1997(E)
3.3 reference material: A material or substance one or more of whose property values are sufficiently
homogeneous and well established to be used for the calibration of an apparatus, the assessment of a
measurement method or for assigning values to materials.
A reference material may be in the form of a pure or mixed gas, liquid or solid. Examples are water for the
NOTE -
calibration of viscometers, sapphire as a heat-capacity calibrant in calorimetry, and solutions used for calibration in chemical
analysis. [ISO Guide 301
34 . Terms related to accuracy and uncertainty
NOTE - Since traceability essentially serves the purpose of assessment and control of accuracy, viz the uncertainty of
measurement, the following terms relating to accuracy and uncertainty are also key terms of this document. The definitions,
taken from IS0 3534-1, have been adapted to usage in the field of measurement instead of testing, by substitution of
corresponding terms ( “measurement result” instead of “test result ”, and “true value” instead of “accepted reference value ”).
In some cases, the notes to the definitions have also been modified.
3.4.1 accuracy: The closeness of agreement between a measurement result and the true value of the
measurand.
NOTE - The term accuracy, whe n applied to a set of measurement results, describes a combination of random components
bias corn pone nt. [Adapted from IS0 3534-I]
and a corn mon systematic error or
3.4.2 trueness: The clo seness of ag reement b etween the average value obtained from a large series of
the true value of the m ea surand.
meas urement results and
NOTES
The measure of trueness is usually expressed in terms of bias.
1
2 Until recently, “accuracy” was used with the meaning of “trueness ”. This usage no longer conforms with international
standardization. [Adapted from IS0 3534-l I
3.4.3 precision: The closeness of agreement between independent measurement results obtained under
presc ribed conditions.
NOTES
1 Precision depends only on the distribution of random errors and does not relate to the true value.
2 Precision is a qualitative term relating to the dispersion between the results of measurements of the same measurand,
carried out under specified conditions of measurement. Quantitative measures of precision such as variance or standard
deviation critically depend on the variation implied by the specified measurement conditions. Repeatability and reproducibility
are two particular concepts of precision, relating to the endpoints on the scale of variability in measurement conditions.
[Adapted from IS0 3534-l 1
.
measurement result which characterizes the range of values within
3.4.4 uncertainty . An estimate a ttach ed to a
.
.
which the true valu asserted to Ire
NOTES
1 Uncertainty of measurements comprises, in general, many components. Some of these components may be estimated on
the basis of the statistical distribution of the results of series of measurements and can be characterized by experimental
standard deviations. Estimates of other components can only be based on experience or other information.
2 Uncertainty should be distinguished from an estimate attached to a measurement result which characterizes the range of
values within which the expectation is asserted to lie. This latter estimate is a measure of precision rather than of accuracy and
should be used only when the true value is not defined. When the expectation is used instead of the true value, the expression
“random component of uncertainty” must be used. [Adapted from IS0 3534-I]
For suggested further reading see annex C, reference [IT].
3.4.5 Further comment on main terms
of
Since the termi nology relating to accuracy/uncertainty measurement has recently undergone substantial
changes, a short comment on th e meaning of the main ter ms will be given.
3

---------------------- Page: 13 ----------------------

SIST EN ISO 14111:2000
@ IS0
IS0 14111:1997(E)
“Accuracy ”, “trueness” and “precision” are qualitative terms used to express the smallness of expected
measurement errors. Hereby accuracy as the more general term refers to the total measurement error, trueness to
the systematic component(s) of the measurement error and precision to the random component(s) of the
measurement error.
and “random uncertainty (dispersion)” are qualitative terms used to
“Uncertainty ”, “systematic uncertainty”
express the extent of expected measurement errors, as the counterparts of accuracy, trueness and precision,
respectively. Accuracy and uncertainty are reciprocal terms: high accuracy is equivalent to small uncertainty, and
the same is true for both the other pairs of reciprocal terms - trueness/systematic uncertainty and
precision/random uncertainty (dispersion).
For quantitative expressions of accuracy or uncertainty, the common measures, derived from the results of
repeated measurements, are:
“bias” for systematic uncertainty
and
“standard deviation” for random uncertainty (dispersion).
NOTES
1 This clause gives those terms and definitions which are essential to understand before proceeding further in the text. Other
terms and definitions used in the text, for which it is not necessary to have an exact understanding at this stage, are given in
annex A.
2 This document mainly employs terms which have been defined previously by committees within ISO, OIML (International
Organization of Legal Metrology), BIPM (Bureau International des Poids et Mesures) and IEC (International Electrotechnical
Commission), as well as terms and definitions which are being proposed with revisions of other International Standards or
Guides.
3 In producing this document, it has been acknowledged that there are serious problems in applying some terms, which
originate from physical metrology, to the field of chemical metrology. Furthermore, no international vocabulary of basic and
general terms for chemical metrology is yet available. Therefore additional notes and remarks are appended to the definitions
given both here and in annex A wherever this has been felt necessary for clarification.
4 Fundamental principles of metrological traceability
4.1 Traceability and accuracy
In recent years, the term “traceability” has come into considerable vogue, but in doing so it has (in common with
many other technical terms) tended to lose its proper scientific pedigree. Thus it has been turned into a general-
purpose catchword, (mis)used in a variety of generous interpretations, extending down as far as nothing much
more than a tenuous synonym for reliability. In this document, however, it is used exclusively in the original and
authentic scientific sense of metrological traceability.
In this sense, traceability is essentially a means of providing an assurance that the accuracy of the results from one
measurement system or technique can be related in a known way (transferred) to the results from another. For
example, the result of an “everyday” (field) method should be demonstrably traceable to the result of a reference
method, and the result of a reference method should be demonstrably traceable to the result of a definitive
method. Traceability is usually mediated by some kind of (certified) reference object or material having known
metrological qualities.
4.2 Structure of traceability chains
Self-evidently, the literal meaning of traceability is the ability to trace. In metrology (the science of measurement)
this implies the existence of an unbroken, identifiable and demonstrable pathway between the measurement
process in question and some quantity or set of quantities regarded as “fundamental” or “indisputable ”. Such a
pathway is called a traceability chain; the most complete chains have clear links all the way back to SI units.
The purp
ose of all claims for t raceability is to esta b lish, or guarantee the accuracy of measuremen t. Measurement
I
consists almost al ways of the comparison an un
of known, the value of which is desired, with a sta n dard, the value
4

---------------------- Page: 14 ----------------------

SIST EN ISO 14111:2000
@ IS0 IS0 14111:1997(E)
of which is taken as known. In physical measurements, the known is often an object calibrated (using a defined
method) against a higher standard within a hierarchical structure. By moving upwards through the various levels in
such a hierarchy, traceability to primary standards can be obtained.
The major conceptual elements which are usually present in a typical traceability hierarchy are indicated in figure 1;
what is needed in order to address any real metrological question is the existence, at each level, of reference
objects or materials that can be used in realizing the standard represented by that level.
Level 0
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Test sample
Level 4
Figure 1 - Conceptual traceability hierarchy
The transfer of information between the various levels in the hierarchy is accomplished by methodology
interconnections which create the traceability chain. Such a chain typically has many links between each level in
the hierarchy. Each link is formed by either the whole or, more commonly, some sub-system or part of the defined
method, and will probably involve auxiliary standard objects or materials (e.g. thermometers or mass pieces) which
realize values or scales of subsidiary or subordinate physical properties.
In apt analogy with a mechanical chain, it is clear that a traceability chain is no stronger than its weakest link. The
best chains have few links, each of which is very secure. When the pathway is fully defined and documented, an
assignment of uncertainty can be made at any point in the chain and at each level in the hierarchy. If the pathway is
broken (that is, if linking information is missing), uncertainties of measurement cannot be assigned at that point,
and complete traceability cannot be obtained. Consequently, the measured value is then not traceable to SI units,
perhaps not even to primary or secondary standards, but just as far as to where the break occurs. A statement
about traceability without reference to the end-point of the chain is of no value.
4.3 Traceability in chemical analysis
In essence, then, traceability is an information retrieval process. In chemical analysis, the information needed to
support the result comprises details of the analytical methods and reference materials used, together with all the
associated uncertainties.
As discussed in greater detail in IS0 Guide 35, traceability is much more difficult to realize in quantitative chemical
analysis (chemical metrology) than in physical metrology, mainly due to the complexities of the overall analytical
process Nevertheless, the concept of traceability is similar, at least in principle.
Analyses must be made by comparison of the relevant attributes of the sample against the known attributes of
reference materials. This may be done either directly, or indirectly by means of scales or instruments that have
been calibrated using (one or more) accepted reference values.
5

---------------------- Page: 15 ----------------------

SIST EN ISO 14111:2000
@ IS0
IS0 14111:1997(E)
The additional complexities arise because a proper correspondence between the sample and reference material
may be difficult to achieve for a variety of reasons.
Firstly, several reference materials realizing various levels of composition for each target component may be
required for a multi-component sample. Secondly, the matrix which contains the analyte could have a significantly
disturbing effect on the analysis. Similarly, any other chemical compound present in the sample may have an
interferent effect on the determination of the target compound. Finally, the sampling procedure itself is a significant
error source, e.g. due to lack of homogeneity of the bulk material from which the sample is taken, and to
contamination as well as degradation of the sample.
The exact requirements and procedures (protocols) necessary to ensure traceability must, therefore, depend upon
the specific problem being addressed. In chemical metrology, the proper transfer of accuracy can only be achieved
with very detailed protocols. Any such protocol should be considered as a fundamental part of the particular
analytical method, and can therefore become an integral part of an international standard method.
5 Elaboration of the traceability concept
5.1 Distinction from related concepts
Despite what may appear above as a clear identification of what is meant by traceability, there remain differing
interpretations of just what the concept can involve. These differences seem to arise because usage of the term is
fed not from a single discipline, but from such diverse sources as legal regulation of operational practices,
monitoring the performance standards of instruments or machines, and quality assurance in manufacturing
processes, as well as from pure metrological science.
Thus, the current main interpretations of traceability, discernible to the present authors, are
a) Traceability = Ability to provide complete information about every step involved in or relevant to arriving at a
measurement result, by documented records.
b) Traceability = Ability to provide evidence that measurement results are equivalent to results obtained by an
authoritative laboratory.
Traceability = Ability to demonstrate that a measuring system regularly produces accurate results on selected
d
measurands.
= Ability to prove the validity of individual measurement results by complete reduction to, for
d) Traceability
example, property values realized by measurement standards or reference materials, or to accepted values of
physical constants.
These concepts are termed, respectively, “administrative ”, “authoritarian ”, “demonstrative” and “definitive ”. They
are increasingly purposeful in the order given.
The administrative concept (a) is of little concern in science because, while extensive documentation may be
necessary, it is not sufficient to achieve the intent of traceability, namely the assurance of adequate accuracy of
measurement. With regard to this goal, the authoritarian concept (b) is also rather unsatisfactory, since it merely
refers to apparently correct results instead of demanding procedural correctness (i.e. the presence of proper
metrological links).
The definition of traceability given in 3.1, adopted from the International Vocabulary of Basic and General Terms in
Metrology (VIM), permits interpretation in the senses intended by both concept (c) and concept (d). As the main
difference, traceability according to the definitive concept (d) implies assurances of validity for individual
measurement results, and therefore demands considerably more than the demonstrative concept (c) where the
aim is verification of overall measurement system performance.
5.2 Requirements for secure traceability chains
The formal requirements for secure metrological traceability are clearly embedded in definition 3.1, interpreted and
illuminated in accordance with the definitive concept (d) defined in 5.1. The main features can be enumerated in
more detail as follows.
6

---------------------- Page: 16 ----------------------

SIST EN ISO 14111:2000
0 IS0 IS0 14111:1997(E)
ity chain between the test object or sample and the standard reference
a) There shall exist an unbroken traceabi
traceability is to be claimed. The latter should normally be a national or
object or reference material to which
international standard, which may be 2 realization of the appropriate SI unit.
b) The traceability chain normally has to include intermediate standard objects or materials in a hierarchical
structure. These intermediate standards shall be of established metrological provenance.
c) The various levels in the hierarchical structure shall be linked by specified and validated test methods which, by
comparisons between objects or materials, allow the transfer of information pertaining to accuracy from one
level to the next lower level. The protocols by which comparisons are made shall be sufficiently well defined
that a result is adequately reproducible.
ard objects or materials used
d) For each test method, any auxiliary stand shal I be traceable to relevant definitive
standards through an auxiliary traceability chain.
stimate of uncertainty to each measurement to
It shall be possible to assign an e in the traceability chain, and
e)
transfer or combine al I of these tn such a way that the desired result carries a p roven assurance 0 f accuracy.
5.3 Applications to chemical analysis
In (quantitative) chemical analysis, direct traceability of individual results to (realizations of) fundamental units is
normally prohibitive, in particular for field analyses, due to the reasons explained in 6.4. As an executable
alternative, traceability of performance (see 7.2.3), in particular of calibration, but e.g. also of separation or
specificity, can be established using either reference analytical methods of known performance or reference
materials of known accuracy. Concerning the latter alternative, as the more typical one in chemical analysis,
traceability of performance is essentially reduced to traceability of the reference materials used in calibration.
These, in turn, must be traced back further along a chain consisting of higher-level reference materials and
measurement systems or methods, until reaching a reference standard of definitive accuracy. Then, in
consequence, accuracy can be assessed on every lower level down to the field measuring system.
As explain
...