Space project management - Part 10-01: Organization and conduct of reviews

EN 16601-10-01 provides means for identifying and structuring all of the activities and information required in a project review. It identifies the information outputs and activities necessary to complete the process. It also provides a check-list of activities and information required for each of the project reviews identified in the ECSS Management Standards. This standard may be tailored for the specific characteristics and constraints of a space project, in conformance with ECSS-S-ST-00.

Raumfahrt-Projektmanagement - Teil 10-01: Organisation und Durchführung von Reviews

Diese Norm liefert die Mittel zur Identifizierung und Strukturierung sämtlicher Maßnahmen (Aktivitäten) und Informationen, die bei einer Projektüberprüfung (kurz „Projektreview“) erforderlich sind. Sie legt die Ziele der Information und Maßnahmen fest, die für die Durchführung des Prozesses erforderlich sind. Weiterhin gibt sie in Form einer Checkliste die Informationen und Maßnahmen an, die für die bei den ECSS-Normen zum Management genannten wichtigen Projektreviews erforderlich sind.
Diese Norm darf auf die speziellen Merkmale und Vorgaben eines Raumfahrtprojektes nach ECSS-M-ST-00 ausgelegt werden.

Management des projets spatiaux - Partie 10-01: Organisation et conduite de revues

Vodenje vesoljskih projektov - 10-01. del: Organizacija in izvedba pregleda

Standard EN 16601-10-01 zagotavlja način opredelitve in strukturiranja vseh dejavnosti ter informacij, zahtevanih v pregledu projekta. Določa informacijske izhode in dejavnosti, potrebne za dokončanje procesa. Zagotavlja tudi kontrolni seznam dejavnosti in informacij, zahtevanih za vsak pregled projekta, opredeljen v standardih upravljanja ECSS. Ta standard se lahko prilagodi posameznim lastnostim in omejitvam vesoljskega projekta v skladu s standardom ECSS-S-ST-00.

General Information

Status
Published
Publication Date
14-Oct-2014
Technical Committee
Current Stage
6060 - National Implementation/Publication (Adopted Project)
Start Date
24-Sep-2014
Due Date
29-Nov-2014
Completion Date
15-Oct-2014

Relations

Buy Standard

Standard
EN 16601-10-01:2014
English language
26 pages
sale 10% off
Preview
sale 10% off
Preview
e-Library read for
1 day

Standards Content (Sample)

2003-01.Slovenski inštitut za standardizacijo. Razmnoževanje celote ali delov tega standarda ni dovoljeno.Vodenje vesoljskih projektov - 10-01. del: Organizacija in izvedba pregledaRaumfahrt-Projektmanagement - Teil 10-01: Organisation und Durchführung von ReviewsManagement des projets spatiaux - Partie 10-01: Organisation et conduite de revuesSpace project management - Part 10-01: Organization and conduct of reviews49.140Vesoljski sistemi in operacijeSpace systems and operations03.100.40Raziskave in razvojResearch and developmentICS:Ta slovenski standard je istoveten z:EN 16601-10-01:2014SIST EN 16601-10-01:2014en,fr,de01-november-2014SIST EN 16601-10-01:2014SLOVENSKI
STANDARDSIST EN 14093:20041DGRPHãþD



SIST EN 16601-10-01:2014



EUROPEAN STANDARD NORME EUROPÉENNE EUROPÄISCHE NORM
EN 16601-10-01
August 2014 ICS 49.140 Supersedes EN 14093:2002
English version
Space project management - Part 10-01: Organization and conduct of reviews
Management des projets spatiaux - Partie 10-01: Organisation et conduite de revues
Raumfahrt-Projektmanagement - Teil 10-01: Organisation und Durchführung von Reviews This European Standard was approved by CEN on 14 December 2013.
CEN and CENELEC members are bound to comply with the CEN/CENELEC Internal Regulations which stipulate the conditions for giving this European Standard the status of a national standard without any alteration. Up-to-date lists and bibliographical references concerning such national standards may be obtained on application to the CEN-CENELEC Management Centre or to any CEN and CENELEC member.
This European Standard exists in three official versions (English, French, German). A version in any other language made by translation under the responsibility of a CEN and CENELEC member into its own language and notified to the CEN-CENELEC Management Centre has the same status as the official versions.
CEN and CENELEC members are the national standards bodies and national electrotechnical committees of Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey and United Kingdom.
CEN-CENELEC Management Centre: Avenue Marnix 17, B-1000 Brussels © 2014 CEN/CENELEC All rights of exploitation in any form and by any means reserved worldwide for CEN national Members and for CENELEC Members. Ref. No. EN 16601-10-01:2014 E SIST EN 16601-10-01:2014



EN 16601-10-01:2014 (E) 2 Table of contents Foreword . 4 1 Scope . 5 2 Normative references . 6 3 Terms, definitions and abbreviated terms . 7 3.1 Terms from other standards . 7 3.2 Terms specific to the present standard . 7 3.3 Abbreviated terms. 8 4 Fundamentals of reviews . 9 4.1 Basic principles . 9 4.2 Review tasks . 9 4.2.1 Initiation of the review . 9 4.2.2 Preparation and distribution of the review data-package . 9 4.2.3 Review of the documentation . 10 4.2.4 Review findings and conclusions . 10 5 Requirements . 11 5.1 General . 11 5.2 Review bodies . 11 5.3 Roles and tasks . 12 5.3.1 Review authority . 12 5.3.2 Customer . 12 5.3.3 Supplier . 13 5.3.4 Review team leader . 13 5.3.5 Review team . 13 5.4 Prerequisite conditions for holding the review . 13 5.5 Review meetings . 14 5.5.1 Prerequisite key point . 14 5.5.2 Kick-off meeting . 14 5.5.3 Coordination meeting . 14 5.5.4 Collocation meeting . 14 SIST EN 16601-10-01:2014



EN 16601-10-01:2014 (E) 3 5.5.5 Review team close-out meeting . 14 5.5.6 Review authority meeting . 15 5.6 RID processing and action item follow-up . 15 Annex A (normative) Review procedure - DRD . 16 Annex B (normative) Review item discrepancy (RID) - DRD . 18 Annex C (normative) Review team report - DRD . 21 Annex D (normative) Review authority report - DRD . 23 Annex E (informative) Logic diagram for RID processing . 24 Annex F (informative) Examples for defined terms . 25 Bibliography . 26
Figures Figure 4-1: Review information flow. 10 Figure B-1 : Example of RID form . 19 Figure B-2 : Example of RID form (continued) . 20 Figure E-1 : Flow logic for the RID processing . 24
SIST EN 16601-10-01:2014



EN 16601-10-01:2014 (E) 4 Foreword This document (EN 16601-10-01:2014) has been prepared by Technical Committee CEN/CLC/TC 5 “Space”, the secretariat of which is held by DIN. This standard (EN 16601-10-01:2014) originates from ECSS-M-ST-10-01C. This European Standard shall be given the status of a national standard, either by publication of an identical text or by endorsement, at the latest by February 2015, and conflicting national standards shall be withdrawn at the latest by February 2015. Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the elements of this document may be the subject of patent rights. CEN [and/or CENELEC] shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent rights. This document supersedes EN 14093:2002. This document has been developed to cover specifically space systems and has therefore precedence over any EN covering the same scope but with a wider domain of applicability (e.g. : aerospace). According to the CEN-CENELEC Internal Regulations, the national standards organizations of the following countries are bound to implement this European Standard: Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey and the United Kingdom. SIST EN 16601-10-01:2014



EN 16601-10-01:2014 (E) 5 1 Scope This Standard provides means for identifying and structuring all of the activities and information required in a project review. It identifies the information outputs and activities necessary to complete the process. It also provides a check–list of activities and information required for each of the project reviews identified in the ECSS Management Standards. This standard may be tailored for the specific characteristics and constraints of a space project, in conformance with ECSS-S-ST-00. SIST EN 16601-10-01:2014



EN 16601-10-01:2014 (E) 6 2 Normative references The following normative documents contain provisions which, through reference in this text, constitute provisions of this ECSS Standard. For dated references, subsequent amendments to, or revision of any of these publications do not apply, However, parties to agreements based on this ECSS Standard are encouraged to investigate the possibility of applying the more recent editions of the normative documents indicated below. For undated references, the latest edition of the publication referred to applies.
EN reference Reference in text Title EN-16601-00-01 ECSS-S-ST-00-01 ECSS system - Glossary of terms EN 16601-10 ECSS-M-ST-10 Space project management - Project planning and implementation EN 16603-10 ECSS-E-ST-10 Space engineering - System engineering general requirements EN 16602-10 ECSS-Q-ST-10
Space product assurance - Product assurance management SIST EN 16601-10-01:2014



EN 16601-10-01:2014 (E) 7 3 Terms, definitions and abbreviated terms 3.1 Terms from other standards For the purpose of this Standard, the terms and definitions from ECSS-S-ST-00-01 apply, in particular for the following terms: customer NOTE 1 In the context of the current document, it identifies the body ensuring the execution of all tasks necessary for the realization of the project according to the high level requirement document and within the financial resources allocated by the consumer. NOTE 2 The customer is responsible for the implementation of the review recommendations endorsed by the review authority.
NOTE 2 See informative annex F for example of application of the above to different levels of a space project supplier NOTE 1 In the context of the current document, it identifies the body executing all tasks necessary for the realization of the project according to the terms and condition of a business agreement submitted by the customer.
NOTE 2 See informative Annex F for example of application of the above to different levels of a space project 3.2 Terms specific to the present standard 3.2.1 consumer body specifying a project or (product) through a high level requirement document (such as mission statement or SFS and STS) and providing the necessary financial resources for its realization. NOTE
See informative Annex F for example of application of the above to different levels of a space project SIST EN 16601-10-01:2014



EN 16601-10-01:2014 (E) 8 3.2.2 review authority body appointed by the consumer organization, having the mandate to issue recommendations to the customer and issue decisions relating to the review process NOTE
This is also referred to as the review board. 3.2.3 review item discrepancy (RID) issue, identified by a reviewer, that is not compliant with a requirement, a review objective or a design goal
3.2.4 review prerequisite conditions necessary to be fulfilled prior to the start of the review 3.2.5 review team body appointed by the review authority, having the mandate to evaluate the status of the project under review 3.2.6 review team leader person responsible for the review team activities and issuing the review team report 3.3 Abbreviated terms For the purpose of this Standard, the abbreviated terms from ECSS-S-ST-00-01 and the following apply: Abbreviation Meaning DRD document requirement description FEPS Fiche d’étude de problème soulevé MRD mission requirements document RID review item discrepancy SRD system requirements document
SIST EN 16601-10-01:2014



EN 16601-10-01:2014 (E) 9 4 Fundamentals of reviews 4.1 Basic principles Project reviews are examinations of the technical status of a project and associated issues at a particular point in time. Their primary purpose is to provide a comprehensive assessment of the project status against targets and requirements. Through independent participation, they give additional support to the project concerned at crucial stages and give the responsible management confidence in the technical progress being achieved. Additionally, reviews can identify potential lessons learned. Reviews are carried out throughout the project life cycle, as defined in ECSS-M-ST-10, at all levels from mission to unit level. The review purpose, mandate and documentation vary for each particular project and for the specific phase or stage of activity of the project. The efficiency of any review process is dependent upon the planning and organization of the review work, including specific assignment of responsibilities and the plan to close out the action items raised during the review.
The current ECSS document specifies basic principles in order to establish these organisational aspects. 4.2 Review tasks 4.2.1 Initiation of the review This task comprises the assignment of review members to the review bodies, the preparation and release of the review procedure and the assessment of the prerequisites. 4.2.2 Preparation and distribution of the review data-package This task comprises the preparation and distribution of the documentation as defined in the review procedure. In a kick-off meeting review participants are familiarized with the review objectives and the documentation submitted for the review. SIST EN 16601-10-01:2014



EN 16601-10-01:2014 (E) 10 4.2.3 Review of the documentation This task comprises the detailed review of the review data-package including additional information provided in the kick-off presentation. Identified problems, questions and solutions arising from the examination of the documentation are recorded on review item discrepancy (RID) forms. Collocation meetings between the review team and the customer/supplier serve to solve issues raised in RIDs, to consolidate findings and to provide recommendations for RID closure. Finally a report is issued on the behalf of the review team, synthesizing the results of the review and identifying major issues for attention of the review authority. The information flow for this review activity is illustrated in Figure 4-1. An example of a logic diagram for the RID processing is presented in Annex E. SUPPLIERREVIEW TEAMCUSTOMERREVIEW AUTHORITYProvides the Data-PackValidates the Data-PackReports findings and recommendati
...

Questions, Comments and Discussion

Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.